• Level 5, Evandale Place, 142 Bundall Road, Bundall, QLD, Australia

Blog

Set off Clause in Construction Contract

Set-off and Recourse to Security

In nearly all disputes that proceed to adjudication under BCIPA a principal will attempt to use a set-off clause in the construction contract to reduce or eliminate entirely, the amount claimed by a subcontractor pursuant to a payment claim. The most common set-off made by principals are damages for alleged defective work or liquidated damages for delay. Whenever possible subcontractors should closely scrutinise any set-off clause in a construction contract prior to signing the contract. It is possible to limit the operation of a set-off clause in a construction contract.  This in turn will limit the circumstances in which a principal can try and apply a set-off under the construction contract to defeat a claim for payment by a subcontractor. Subcontractors are often met with the risk of losing their security provided under a construction contract where a principal asserts a right to have recourse to the security, on the basis that the principal is owed money by the subcontractor. Unfortunately, time and time again subcontractors are exposed to such claims because of poorly drafted construction contracts that fail to adequately protect a subcontractor’s interests. There are mechanisms available to substantially limit the circumstances in which a principal can have recourse to your security without giving a subcontractor time to take steps to stop a principal having recourse to the security.  These mechanisms include:- A provision in the construction contract which provides that a principal can only have recourse to security for a debt due and owing under the construction contract by a subcontractor as opposed to damages; A provision in the construction contract which provides that the principal must give at least 7 days written notice to the subcontractor of its intention to have recourse to the security before doing so; Section 67J of the Queensland Building Construction & Commission Act 1991 requires a principal to comply with the notice requirements of this section. A failure to do so will disentitle a party to have recourse to the security under a construction contract. If you are in dispute with a contractor/principal under a construction contract in relation to security and require legal assistance, or you need advice prior to entering into a construction contract, please contact Justin Mathews of our office on 07 5574 0111 or via email at justinm@qbmlaw.com.au.

Beware if Subcontractors are not licensed to carry out construction work

The recent decision of the Supreme Court of Queensland in St Hilliers Property Pty Ltd v Pronto Solar Innovations Pty Ltd highlights the consequences that can result if Subcontractors are not licensed to carry out any aspect of work to be undertaken under a construction contract. Subcontractors must ensure that you are licensed to carry out each and every item of work set out in the scope of works incorporated into a construction contract at the time of entering into the construction contact. If you are not licensed to carry out any item of work, you are not entitled to any monetary or other consideration for doing any work pursuant to the construction contract. This means that Subcontractors are not entitled to progress payments under section 7, 12 and 17 of the BCIPA. Therefore, any payment claim is invalid and of no effect under the BCIPA. Further, any adjudication determination made in favour of a Subcontractor not licensed to carry out work is void and of no effect and can be set aside. The decision also highlights that in these circumstances, the Subcontractor will also be unable to issue valid charges under the Subcontractors Charges Act 1974 (Qld) (“the SCA”). This is because there is no payment due in accordance with the construction contract which a charge under the SCA could secure. Therefore, a Subcontractor may be entirely unsecured and at risk of recovering nothing for work done in the event of the insolvency of the other contracting party. If you require further information or assistance please contact Justin Mathews of our office on (07) 5574 0111 or email justinm@qbmlaw.com.au.

Queensland Government Delays Commencement of Parts of the Building Industry Fairness (Security of Payment) Act 2017

Earlier this year, the Queensland Building and Construction Commission announced that Chapters 3, 4 and 5 of the Building Industry Fairness (Security of Payment) Act 2017 (“BIFSPA”) that relate to statutory progress payments and subcontractors charges would commence on 1 July 2018. The Government has now announced that Chapters 3, 4 and 5 of BIFSPA will not commence until 17 December 2018.  That means that payment claims, payment schedules and adjudication applications will continue to be governed by the Building and Construction Industry Payments Act 2004 (“BCIPA”). Remember, under BCIPA:- Your invoice must have an endorsement that it is made under the BCIPA. A payment claim must be served within 6 months of completion of work. Your payment claim must be issued on the reference date specified in the construction contract. If you do not receive a payment schedule, you nevertheless must send a second chance notice to a contractor inviting the contractor to submit a payment schedule prior to issuing proceedings or making an adjudication application to recover the amount owing pursuant to a payment claim. Strict time limits apply that must be complied with. Strict time limits apply to make an adjudication application if you receive a payment schedule in response to a payment claim. Sometimes you may have to choose between recovery under BCIPA or proceeding with notices to secure funds by way of a charge to a contractor and enforcement under the SCA.  If you pursue the option of proceeding under the SCA you are unable to pursue recovery under BCIPA. Strict time limits apply under the SCA for the issuing of notices.  You may have to act swiftly to utilise these processes to secure funds, if contractors are delaying payments and/or unable to pay you,  prior to you issuing proceedings to recover monies owing to you under a construction contract. We have acted for subcontractors in various building projects, where the mechanisms available under the SCA have been successfully used to assist subcontractors to secure monies and ultimately recover monies owing from contractors who engaged them and become insolvent. For further enquiries and assistance please contact Justin Mathews of our office on (07) 5574 0111 or email justinm@qbmlaw.com.au.

When Should I Retain My Lawyer If I Want To Buy Or Sell Property?

It is often the case that buyers and sellers in property transaction do not think to engage a lawyer until after they have secured a contract of sale.  The obvious reason for this is an avoidance of legal costs.  The other reason is that sellers are generally of the view that they know all about their own property.  Sometimes this is not the case. If you are a seller, there can be a number of pitfalls in waiting until you have a contract to engage a lawyer.  Residential property contract will almost always contain ‘warranties’ which the seller gives to the buyer.  A warranty is a promise or assurance that something is or isn’t as it should be at either the date of contract or at settlement date. For example, under a standard form contract a seller gives a warranty that at the contract date the property is not affected by any proposal for transport infrastructure.  Transport infrastructure can be works such as a road widening or a new road.  If there is a proposal and it is not adequately disclosed in the contact the Buyer will be entitled to terminate the contract at any time prior to settlement. In Queensland a number of properties are affected by these transport infrastructure proposals and the property owner is completely unaware of the government’s plans for such works. Details of future transport infrastructure works can be discovered by a search. In some circumstances this can impact on the possible uses for the property in terms of future development and thereby possibly devaluing the property. Properties can also be affected by ‘statutory easements’ which are sometimes not discoverable by a standard search such as a title search, which is the usual search an agent would undertake.  If these statutory are not disclosure in the contract the Buyer will have an automatic right of termination. In either circumstance, the issue may be dealt with by either: 1.   Amending the warranty given in the contract; 2.   Removing the warranty in its entirety from the contract; or 3.   Making the necessary disclosure in the contract. If either a buyer or seller had have engaged a lawyer to undertake searches prior to entering into the contract, then this could have been revealed and dealt with in the contract.  Ultimately, you cannot avoid the burden on the property but you can be aware of it and have your contract drafted to as to either make the prospective buyer aware or remove the right of termination. Conversely, if a buyer seeks our assistance prior to signing a contract we can undertake investigations in to the property so that they are informed when entering into the negotiation process and signing contracts.  In some circumstances, this may be information which determines if the property is suitable for them prior to going into the negotiation process.  These investigations are even more so important if the buyer is proposing bidding at an auction whereby your usual rights as a buyer may be diminished. At QBM Lawyers we always encourage our clients to speak with us when they are looking to list their property or looking at entering into a contract to purchase a property and at all time prior to signing the contract.  We are always happy to undertake searches and prepare the contracts for the real estate agent or even assist the agent in preparing the contract.